Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Tavern"

From GodWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(โ†’โ€ŽShould this template use decat=yes?: new section)
(Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit)
 
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
I would vote to remove {{para|decat|yes}} from this template, and suggest that the right way to take those two taverns off the category is to add content to the templates instead. ๐Ÿ˜Š -- [[User:Djonni|Djonni]] ([[User talk:Djonni|talk]]) 08:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 
I would vote to remove {{para|decat|yes}} from this template, and suggest that the right way to take those two taverns off the category is to add content to the templates instead. ๐Ÿ˜Š -- [[User:Djonni|Djonni]] ([[User talk:Djonni|talk]]) 08:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 +
 +
: I don't think the issue is really the decat parameter in that case. It's more that, when creating the template, I arbitrary decided that the two paramaters I included were optional and wouldn't appear unless called. If they did appear even with an "Unknow" data, it wouldn't be categorized in [[:Category:Articles which use infobox templates with no data rows]] (gosh that category is long-titled), like for example the {{tlx|monster}}, which would categorize there on empty infoboxes if it wasn't for class/habitat/description parameter being there by default.
 +
: It's either we make it like the other infoboxes and make those parameter appears even if not called, or the opposite way: make all infoboxes goes to that category if no data is given.
 +
 +
: As for the {{tlx|quest}} infobox, well I couldn't find any parameter that could suit all the quests, though it can have data row when using the [[Template talk:Quest|hidden mini-quest parameters]]. And thank [[User:FeRDNYC]] for its design! --[[User:WardPhoenix|WardPhoenix]] ([[User talk:WardPhoenix|talk]]) 13:22, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:22, 25 November 2019

Should this template use decat=yes?

So, the purpose of Category:Articles which use infobox templates with no data rows in my mind, is to do two things for wiki maintainers:

  1. Show us pages or templates that have potentially broken infoboxes, and
  2. Show us pages that have under-used infoboxes.

I think the point of an infobox is to show a summary of interesting information. Personally, I think it's worthwhile to know that there are Tavern pages where the infobox just has a picture (and a default picture, too). It's a sign that there's some missing content that ought to be added or created, I think. I know that we already have {{stub}} and {{picture}} making lists of where content can be improved, but to me, I was interested to see that there were two taverns that haven't had anything put into the infoboxes at all.

I think the Tavern template is different to the {{Quest}} template, too. The Quest template hugely improves a page simply by being there, even with no parameters set โ€” it's by far the most beautifully made of the infobox templates. It's visually appealing, and immediately gives a really strong quest-iness to an article. So putting it into a Quest article without any parameters is, to me, totally reasonable.

But taking a look at At the Dragon and The Rumor Mill, as lovely as the infobox is, I think it really needs a bit more on those pages. So, for me, having those pages in a maintenance category will make it more likely that someone will come along and get creative with them. And when in future new taverns are inevitably added to the game/wiki, I think it will be useful to have the category in case those infoboxes need more added to them to. ๐Ÿ˜Š

I would vote to remove |decat=yes from this template, and suggest that the right way to take those two taverns off the category is to add content to the templates instead. ๐Ÿ˜Š -- Djonni (talk) 08:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

I don't think the issue is really the decat parameter in that case. It's more that, when creating the template, I arbitrary decided that the two paramaters I included were optional and wouldn't appear unless called. If they did appear even with an "Unknow" data, it wouldn't be categorized in Category:Articles which use infobox templates with no data rows (gosh that category is long-titled), like for example the {{monster}}, which would categorize there on empty infoboxes if it wasn't for class/habitat/description parameter being there by default.
It's either we make it like the other infoboxes and make those parameter appears even if not called, or the opposite way: make all infoboxes goes to that category if no data is given.
As for the {{quest}} infobox, well I couldn't find any parameter that could suit all the quests, though it can have data row when using the hidden mini-quest parameters. And thank User:FeRDNYC for its design! --WardPhoenix (talk) 13:22, 25 November 2019 (UTC)