Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pantheon of Crosswordery"

From GodWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (If people are interested in this, I think it's great to track it here: reply)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
:::Oh, I can rename the article, no problem. Sorry about the "ownership" message, I have removed it. I don't really want to move it to a subpage of my userpage, because I feel like that's not the best place for it since it's something for GV as a whole. -- [[User:Cassia Rainsonne|Cassia Rainsonne]] ([[User talk:Cassia Rainsonne|talk]]) 23:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 
:::Oh, I can rename the article, no problem. Sorry about the "ownership" message, I have removed it. I don't really want to move it to a subpage of my userpage, because I feel like that's not the best place for it since it's something for GV as a whole. -- [[User:Cassia Rainsonne|Cassia Rainsonne]] ([[User talk:Cassia Rainsonne|talk]]) 23:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 +
 +
:::: No apology necessary, thanks for understanding. Up to you on the rename, really. If you do Move it (which you can do from the More actions menu), a redirect will be automatically created from the old name, so technically it'll exist at ''both'' names unless a new (official?) [[Pantheon of Crosswordery]] article is created to replace the redirect. -- [[User:FeRDNYC|FeRDNYC]] ([[User talk:FeRDNYC|talk]]) 20:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:22, 14 October 2018

If people are interested in this, I think it's great to track it here

I only have two reservations:

  • I'm not sure about the article name, since (as you say) it's not actually an official Pantheon. Maybe something as simple as renaming it "Unofficial Pantheon of Crosswordery", just so that it doesn't give the impression that it's one of the official pantheons. (Only from the title, obviously anyone who reads the page will understand that it's unofficial.) Not a big deal, just a thought.
  • (This one is much more of a big deal...) We really don't support "ownership" of articles in the main namespace, as that goes against the entire concept of a Wiki. So, I'm really uncomfortable with a wiki article containing a message that nobody else should edit the page, or should get "clearance" from a particular user before editing. If any user wants to maintain a page that only they can edit, they can do so as a subpage of their user page, (for example, perhaps /Crosswordery). That way, all other users will be prohibited from editing it. Otherwise, with a few exceptions (like the Guild articles), the Wiki's articles are open for editing by all users.

-- FeRDNYC (talk) 01:15, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Oh, I can rename the article, no problem. Sorry about the "ownership" message, I have removed it. I don't really want to move it to a subpage of my userpage, because I feel like that's not the best place for it since it's something for GV as a whole. -- Cassia Rainsonne (talk) 23:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
No apology necessary, thanks for understanding. Up to you on the rename, really. If you do Move it (which you can do from the More actions menu), a redirect will be automatically created from the old name, so technically it'll exist at both names unless a new (official?) Pantheon of Crosswordery article is created to replace the redirect. -- FeRDNYC (talk) 20:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC)