Discussion of the Guild Leader page
This page is provided for discussion of the Guild Leader page.
Discussion goes below here!
I wonder if we should add a new category to the list of monsters - "Strong Monster"?
18/4/15 - Someone corrupted the quotation from the blog post by editing it to remove gender specific language. Please don't do that: it was a quotation, which now no longer matched the original text elsewhere (in the blog)! Rather than revert the text to the original and potentially start an edit war I have removed the quotation but left the ref link to the blog post for anyone who cares to see it --The God Of Monsters (talk) 01:50, 18 April 2015 (BST)
I quite liked the quote, so I've put it back, but made it more clearly a quote using the quote template. I also replaced the note about adding a picture with the picture template. Hope this helps.--Brinjal (talk) 16:52, 19 April 2015 (BST)
Invalid totem monsters
According to Category:Monsters with conflicting type parameters, pets and beasties can’t be totem monsters. But this article only says that bosses and strong monsters can’t be totem monsters. Is the category wrong or this article not giving enough information? —Uni34 (talk) 08:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Well, the Category:Monsters with conflicting type parameters is much newer, and came after quite a lot of discussion and investigation by a few people (ref. Template talk:Monster#Strong monster, Template talk:Monster#Ineligible monsters marked as strong, so I'd say the info here is out of date. I reckon you should go ahead and update it! :) -- Djonni (talk) 13:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC)