Difference between revisions of "Talk:Confess love to a snowgirl"

From GodWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m ("There is no quest to “confess love to a snowgirl”.": Not anymore, you're right)
(Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit)
m ("There is no quest to “confess love to a snowgirl”.": Great point)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Might propose (if there isn't already) to have a template&category that deals with outdated content, since deleting appears to be out of reach. [[User:Hankvi Guidza|Hankvi Guidza]] ([[User talk:Hankvi Guidza|talk]]) 23:38, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 
Might propose (if there isn't already) to have a template&category that deals with outdated content, since deleting appears to be out of reach. [[User:Hankvi Guidza|Hankvi Guidza]] ([[User talk:Hankvi Guidza|talk]]) 23:38, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  
: Yeah, outdated seems accurate, as [https://godvillegame.com/forums/search_posts?q=snowgirl&commit=Search it was in the game once upon time,] but Porubský removed as not everybody was comfortable with their heroines confessing same-sex romance 😂
+
: Yeah, outdated seems accurate, as [https://godvillegame.com/forums/search_posts?q=snowgirl&commit=Search it was in the game once upon time,] but was probably removed as not everybody was comfortable with their heroines confessing same-sex romance 😂
  
 
: And I'm reluctant to mark this page for deletion because someone did put some effort into it. Perhaps a category for content that's no longer in the game isn't a bad idea. 🤔 -- [[User:Djonni|Djonni]] ([[User talk:Djonni|talk]]) 23:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 
: And I'm reluctant to mark this page for deletion because someone did put some effort into it. Perhaps a category for content that's no longer in the game isn't a bad idea. 🤔 -- [[User:Djonni|Djonni]] ([[User talk:Djonni|talk]]) 23:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 +
 +
:: I'd wait before puting such content into a delete/depreciated category. After all, it's kinda hard to prove something don't exist right?[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probatio_diabolica]
 +
::I mean, it's not impossible the quest was renamed in such a way we can't find via the endingless quest (I have quests that are accepted in the ideabox, and yet can't find some of them with that page). --[[User:WardPhoenix|WardPhoenix]] ([[User talk:WardPhoenix|talk]]) 13:53, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 +
 +
:::Excellent point about [[wikipedia:Evidence of absence|evidence of absence]], {{u|WardPhoenix}}. When I get home this weekend I'll do some proper research about this and we'll see if we can reach consensus on the balance of evidence. :) Perhaps we can replace ''probatio diabolica'' with ''dubium rationabile'' 😆 -- [[User:Djonni|Djonni]] ([[User talk:Djonni|talk]]) 21:32, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:32, 13 November 2019

"There is no quest to “confess love to a snowgirl”."

Curiously checked it there.

It's such a shame too, but hey, ideas come and go.

Might propose (if there isn't already) to have a template&category that deals with outdated content, since deleting appears to be out of reach. Hankvi Guidza (talk) 23:38, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, outdated seems accurate, as it was in the game once upon time, but was probably removed as not everybody was comfortable with their heroines confessing same-sex romance 😂
And I'm reluctant to mark this page for deletion because someone did put some effort into it. Perhaps a category for content that's no longer in the game isn't a bad idea. 🤔 -- Djonni (talk) 23:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
I'd wait before puting such content into a delete/depreciated category. After all, it's kinda hard to prove something don't exist right?[1]
I mean, it's not impossible the quest was renamed in such a way we can't find via the endingless quest (I have quests that are accepted in the ideabox, and yet can't find some of them with that page). --WardPhoenix (talk) 13:53, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Excellent point about evidence of absence, WardPhoenix. When I get home this weekend I'll do some proper research about this and we'll see if we can reach consensus on the balance of evidence. :) Perhaps we can replace probatio diabolica with dubium rationabile 😆 -- Djonni (talk) 21:32, 13 November 2019 (UTC)